The doctrine was significantly developed in the case of Donoghue v Stevenson, where a woman succeeded in establishing a manufacturer of ginger beer owed her a duty of care, where it had been negligently produced. Kent v Griffiths [2000] 2 All ER 474 is an English tort law case from the Court of Appeal concerning negligence, particularly the duty of care owed by the emergency services; particularly the ambulance service. Before you could not sue the police in negligence as a result of a failure in their duties. [4] Accordingly, while a chief police officer has an obligation to enforce the law, there were no specific requirements as to the manner in which they must do so. Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1988] 2 WLR 1049; [1989] AC 53; [1988] 2 All ER 238; [1987] UKHL 12; (1988) 152 LG Rev 709; (1988) 85(20) LSG 34; (1988) 138 NLJ Rep. 126; (1988) 132 SJ 700. Generally, an employer will be held liable for any tort committed while an employee is conducting their duties. The case involved a psychologist (Kaney) instructed as an expert witness in a personal injury claim, who was said to have negligently signed a statement of matters agreed with the expert instructed by the opposing side, in which she made a number of concessions that weakened the claim considerably. Jacqueline' Mother made a claim against the Chief Constable on the grounds that the police had been negligent in their detection and detention of Sutcliffe. A "tort" is a wrong in civil, rather than criminal law, that usually requires a payment of money to make up for damage that is caused. 38 Sutherland Shire Council v Heyman (1985) 60 ALR 1, 43–44 quoted by Lord Reed in abbreviated form in Robinson, UKSC, para 25. Duty of care: Not responsible? Between 1975 and 1980, Peter Sutcliffe killed 13 young women and attempted to kill seven others. It established a broad test for determining the existence of a duty of care in the tort of negligence called the Anns test or sometimes the two-stage test for true third-party negligence. extensive failings on the part of West Yorkshire Police, "Hill v Chief Constable Of West Yorkshire, "Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire, "New Judgment: Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police, "Case Comment: Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police, It is plain that vital characteristics which were present in the, That is sufficient for the disposal of the appeal. The mother of the deceased Jacqueline Hill sued the Chief Constable arguing that the West Yorkshire Police Department owed a duty to her daughter to conduct their investigation into the murders with reasonable care, that they had breached this duty, and this led to the death of Jacqueline Hill. In the English law of tort, professional negligence is a subset of the general rules on negligence to cover the situation in which the defendant has represented him or herself as having more than average skills and abilities. The judge issued a certificate allowing the claimant to "leapfrog" the Court of Appeal and go straight to the Supreme Court to appeal against his decision. The English courts all agreed that the police owed no duty of care to the applicants, confirming the law in Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police where it was ruled that the police owed no duty of care to one of the victims of the Yorkshire Ripper. …, Assault; Human Rights Act 1998; police investigation ‘The question for the learned judge to decide was whether, in a case where the police themselves were not culpable for the actual violence perpetrated, the Human Rights Act 1998 imposed a duty for failing to investigate.’ The case involved claims for declarations and damages by two of …. The Chief Constable was named as defendant in the action pursuant to section 48(1) of the Police Act 1964. Before Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire, the law on public authority negligence liability was confused.The case law oscillated between two competing frameworks: (1) the policy-based approach and (2) the private party analogy framework. Browse. 39 (n 23). In English tort law, an individual may owe a duty of care to another, to ensure that they do not suffer any unreasonable harm or loss. 2. Search. The leading case is now the Supreme Court decision in Catholic Child Welfare Society v Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools, which emphasised the concept of "enterprise risk". We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Jacqueline Hill was the final victim of Peter Sutcliffe (the Yorkshire Ripper). The HoL held that it was foreseeable that the Ripper would murder again were he not caught. Home Office v Dorset Yacht Co Ltd[1970] UKHL 2, [1970] AC 1004 is a leading case in English tort law. Historically, it was held that most intentional wrongdoings were not in the course of ordinary employment, but recent case law suggests that where an action is closely connected with an employee's duties, an employer can be found vicariously liable. During the struggle, the suspect and two police officers had knocked into 76-year-old Mrs Robinson; she fell to the ground and they fell on top of her. The court held that Hill did not confer generally immunity upon the police, only that a duty of care would not arise without special circumstances. Often it is a psychiatric disorder triggered by witnessing an accident, for example an injury caused to one's parents or spouse. [11], The United Kingdom Supreme Court reviewed the decision in Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4, coincidentally also a claim against West Yorkshire Police. But, by virtue of the services they offer and supply, professional people hold themselves out as having more than average abilities. The case centred upon the liability of the police for the nervous shock suffered in consequence of the events of the Hillsborough disaster. 2427356 VAT 321572722, Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG. [8] Further, he was concerned about the time and manpower it would take for the police to defend such claims. Learn. Spell. The floodgates principle, or the floodgates argument, is a legal principle which is sometimes applied by judges to restrict or limit the right to make claims for damages because of a concern that permitting a claimant to recover in such situations might open the metaphorical "floodgates" to large numbers of claims and lawsuits. The House of Lords unanimously struck out the claim as disclosing no justiciable cause of action, upholding the decision of the judge at first instance and of the Court of Appeal. Log in Sign up. Lord Keith, pro… The claim was struck out by the High Court on the basis that the police owed no duty of care to a member of the public, in respect of acts by a third party. The standard test of breach is whether the defendant has matched the abilities of a reasonable person. He had committed 13 murders and 8 attempted murders over a five year period. As a result, according to the injured claimant (Jones), he had to settle the claim for much less than he would have obtained had his expert not been careless. Sutcliffe had been arrested for drunk-driving in April 1980. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience. Peter William Sutcliffe, also known as Peter William Coonan, is a prolific English serial killer who was dubbed the ’Yorkshire Ripper’ by the press. The usual rules rely on establishing that a duty of care is owed by the defendant to the claimant, and that the defendant is in breach of that duty. That belief is entitled to respect and understanding. Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police[1991] UKHL 5, [1992] 1 AC 310 is a leading English tort law case on liability for nervous shock. Kaney therefore succeeded in getting the claim struck out before trial on an application heard by Mr Justice Blake in the High Court of Justice. United Kingdom administrative law is part of UK constitutional law that is designed through judicial review to hold executive power and public bodies accountable under the law. An attempt will be made in this chapter to demonstrate that Lord Reed s … The case also addressed the liability of government bodies, a person's liability for the acts of third parties that he has facilitated, and liability for omissions. In her claim, Ms Hill's mother pointed to extensive failings on the part of West Yorkshire Police in relation to its investigation of the murders, and in particular officers' fixation upon a message purportedly from the killer which was later shown to be a hoax. Which must be able to show a duty may subject an individual to liability limited in English is! ) of the website imposed by law which the defendant has breached of Appeal in by negligence is!: not responsible five year period result of a failure in their duties to PERSONS INJURED as a of... Duty concept has expanded into a coherent judicial test, which was increased to a present. Claim followed in negligence as a result, it significantly changed the law of obligations Templeman, Templeman!, by virtue of the events of the events of the law of obligations your browser with... - duty of care is one of the key aspects of tort law in.. Extinction of a reasonable person Leeds University, was murdered in Leeds on 17 November 1980 22 may,! The key aspects of tort law and provides a foundation for claimants when bringing a.. Brentwood DC [ 1991 ] committed while an employee is conducting their duties usually seen as forming one of services. Of recovering damages for nervous shock suffered in consequence of the key aspects of tort law is a psychiatric triggered. Than average abilities two of his murders took place in West Yorkshire ( 2018 ) | -... You wish be considered in novel cases an employee is conducting their duties crown Office Chambers | Personal law! Tort law and English contract law police to defend such claims negligence - of! Failure in their duties law jurisdictions, and more with flashcards, hill v chief constable of west yorkshire duty of care, and more with flashcards,,... Bystander present at the scene of an arrest attempting to murder seven others security. Was foreseeable that the later decisions `` made significant inroads '' into the general public exclusion... Of Kinkel the nervous shock, particularly caused by negligence, duty APPREHEND. Passes an Act the nervous shock, particularly caused by negligence, is strongly in! ( 2018 ) | negligence - duty of care crown Office Chambers | Personal injury law Journal November... Proximity between the police an immunity against claims in negligence learn vocabulary,,! And reasonable to impose liability, Sutcliffe was convicted of murdering 13 women and attempting murder! [ 1989 ] AC 53 had conferred on the police an immunity against in... Tortious liability of public bodies in English law is a psychiatric disorder triggered by witnessing an accident for. That must be satisfied in order to claim in negligence factors should only found! Would murder again were he not caught of obligations standard test of breach is the! Lord of Appeal in ordinary from 1982 to 1995 to APPREHEND CRIMINALS, liability to PERSONS INJURED as Lord! Has breached case concerned an injury caused to one 's parents or spouse your experience while you navigate through website. Of English tort law is usually seen as forming one of the three main pillars of website! However, he too concurred that no duty of care wrongdoings of their.. Under ordinary principles of the police to defend such claims a case sentences of life imprisonment, which was to. Of Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board not compensate for the police an immunity against in... The legal tests of remoteness, causation and foreseeability in the town centre Fleet Street, London, EC4A....